|
Digital Photography of Documents
John and Rosie Wells
| Digital cameras are ideal for copying
documents, especially faded manuscripts. The conventional
techniques that we
apply to our ground-based and
kite aerial
archaeological photographs are
equally applicable to documents.
Working outside the visible spectrum (Ultra-violet /
infra-red) is made more easy, as filters are not needed to block visible
light, if the document is lit only by the light of interest. Care should
always be taken and appropriate eye protection worn when using UV light.
Professional systems are much more refined but the
modern digital camera and (often free) photographic software make basic
aspects of these
techniques available to everyone.
|
Colour Channels and Filters

1422 Conveyance to John Bompas by John Tuttebury, son and heir of Henry
Tuttebury
 |
 |
| Original colour |
Colour removed |
 |
 |
| Red Channel and colour
then removed |
Blue channel then colour
removed |
|
Although the
differences between the above images is minimal, with some documents, they
can be quite pronounced, especially if the document is multi-coloured.
There are other very effective
software based techniques. Such approaches can minimise the need for
potentially harmful methodologies, using say,
ultra-violet light
, as pointed out by
others.
However, there are few problems nowadays with recording UV images,
especially if work is limited to UV-A (320-400 nm). Cameras can be
modified to increase their sensitivity to UV light, but many are
sufficiently sensitive to work without modification.
| |
|
 |
|
Fuji S5600 camera
converted for full spectrum use plus B+W 403 filter. Illumination:
Cheap, hand-held, 41 UV
LED flashlight in normal room lighting
(400 ISO, f3.2, 1/4sec.) |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Fuji F30 compact camera
(unmodified), 41 UV LED
flashlight in darkened room, no filter.
(400 ISO, f2.8, 1/15th sec.) |
 |
|
As an experiment, we took apart a £20
Premier fixed focus camera, removed the lens (held by two screws) and
crudely prised out the hot mirror filter (primarily used to reduce IR
transmission but also reduces UV) and then re-assembled the camera.
In a darkened room, we illuminated the manuscript with the same UV LED
flashlight as above and took the photo below. No filters were used. This
illustrates how effective UV images can be produced with equipment (camera
plus lighting) costing less than £30. The modified camera can only focus
on nearby objects. |
 |
|
Premier DS-3090S camera (3MP-9CA)
(100 ISO, f2.8, 1/8th sec.)
We find that UV LEDs produce crisper images than 365nm
UV fluorescent tubes. The light from the LEDs also has a much more
prominent visible violet component than from the tubes. |
Shorter UV wavelengths
can be used to
control the growth of moulds and other micro-organisms
but they can
also cause fading
of the image / text and damage the substrate.
|